![]() ![]() ![]() Though Indyfin is a registered investment adviser, the non-interactive portions of this Website, including the listing of firm and advisor profiles, should not be construed as providing any investment, financial, legal, compliance, tax, or other professional advice, and nothing contained herein should be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security or other financial product. All firms and advisors listed on the Website are independent from and unaffiliated with Indyfin. Verified profiles also contain information supplied by the firm or individual advisor(s) within such firms, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Indyfin or its staff. Information reported by a firm or an advisor in Form ADV and/or Form U4 through IAPD has not been independently verified by Indyfin. This website, the contents of this page, and any additional hyperlinked pages or pop-up windows (collectively, this "Website") have been primarily derived from Form ADV and/or Form U4, as reported by the referenced firm and/or advisor as well as publicly-available information reported to the Investment Adviser Public Disclosure website ("IAPD"). ![]()
0 Comments
![]() Daddy is in his bed, a spring-loaded molded plastic gizmo.Vintage Don't Wake Daddy Board Game Milton Bradley Hasbro 2007 Works Complete. ![]() If you land on a picture-number space then you have to risk waking Daddy. It was a board game with a simple premise: The kids are trying to get to the kitchen for a late-night.Product description Children's game in which players move by drawing cards and moving to the matching space. Don t wake daddy Don't Wake Daddy Comedy A podcast about nostalgic children's board games hosted by Marino Alatzakis, Scott Eikenberry, and Joe Rodriguez More Information Location: United States Genres: Comedy Video Games Description: A podcast about nostalgic children's board games hosted by Marino Alatzakis, Scott Eikenberry, and Joe Rodriguez Language: EnglishEvery ’90s kid™ remembers Don’t Wake Daddy, one of the hit toys of the 1992 Christmas season. ![]() ![]() But this year…things are about to change…Ī modern retelling/spin on A Christmas Carol, Holly Chase is a Scrooge. Every year, it’s the same thing–and old miser, a sob story, three ghosts, and a new outlook on life. Now, as a ghost herself, she works as the Ghost of Christmas Past for Project Scrooge, a company that tries to reform one Scrooge-esque person each year. ![]() On Christmas Eve five years ago, Holly Chase was visited by three ghosts who showed her how selfish and mean-spirited she was to those around her. 2) It was a Christmas story and I freaking love Christmas stories. 1) Cynthia Hand has never steered me wrong before. I was so excited to see this book come out. A sudden tragedy –that’s how the media described it, because she was only fortysomething when it happened, plus Yvonne was famous, so her death was considered a much bigger deal than an ordinary person’s. It was all over the news when it happened, the entertainment shows, the newspapers and magazines, even the trashy tabloids. First Lines: The first thing you should probably know is that Yvonne Worthington Chase was dead. ![]() ![]() ![]() When I was a child, my sister and cousins would plan and put on an impromptu talent show after Thanksgiving dinner. ![]() ![]() Talk over with your kids what their best talents are. We all have talents, no matter how small. ![]() Peel some clementines to eat and empathize with that unforgettable girl who "got stuck" with a fruit name. Her own organizational talents shine through on the night of the big show when she assists her formidable but understanding principal Mrs. Her attempts at juggling and tap dancing don't quite pan out, and dad won't let her bring her little brother for her "Elvis and the Laughing Dog" act. Sure, she's great at art and math, and her dad says she is the queen of noticing things and is very empathetic to boot. Unlike her fourth grade friend and neighbor Margaret, who has a whole alphabet of talents to draw on for the upcoming Talent-Palooza, Night of the Stars, Clementine can't think of even one thing she could do on stage. But when my teacher said, 'Class, we have an exciting project to talk about,' I listened anyway." Poor kid. She jumps right in with her chatty narration: "I have noticed that teachers get exciting confused with boring a lot. It's gratifying to see one of our favorite third grade book characters back in a sequel that is just as funny as her fabulous first book, Clementine. ![]() ![]() ![]() why did we have to witness Miles' wedding of all people? just to have more material for the whole rainbow arch debate (which we will get to)? honestly, going to your ex-boyfriend-who-fucked-you-over's wedding is psychopath behaviour - but maybe that's just me □ there were way too many weddings that i did not care about. i'd say for like the first 50% but i am pretty sure that's an exaggeration but it did feel like fifty so. ![]() □ first of all, as a big Oliver fan: Oliver was barely in this for a good chunk of the book. □ pretend this is a rainbow arch because of ironic reasons It took me about 2 hours to listen to the last fifteen minutes of the audiobook cause I kept stopping every two minutes to rant to no-one in particular, but I am glad to report that I have since calmed down, so I will just calmly explain the reason for my rating in bullet points. I have actually never been to a wedding, can you tell. You may now kiss Boyfriend Material on it's pretty (.probably more like above average, but it's what on the inside that counts) cover. If anyone objects, speak now or forever hold your peace. We will now pretend that Boyfriend Material is the sole book in this series, as god intended. Sometimes not getting a sequel is actually better.ĭearly beloved, we are gathered here today to pretend that Luc and Oliver were not the main characters in this book and it was instead about literally everyone else, cause literally everyone else was hilarious as fuck and Luc and Oliver make me want to murder someone. ![]() ![]() ![]() I’ll take a brief stab at a few of things I found interesting. In addition, both books focus on a short time period with a city as a major character, but the main thing in common is that one or a dozen posts can’t sum up what it feels like to read the work. Many techniques in the style and wordplay are the same, to be sure. Petersburg is often likened to Joyce’s Ulysses and I find myself puzzled at that comparison. ![]() This rhythm mimics the corkscrew-like plotline, circling back on itself while at the same time moving forward. One example I can point to “on the surface” is the repetition of words, phrases and sentences providing a rhythm to the work that begs for it to be read out loud. Even if the language only hints at what the original Russian achieves, it is a wonderful read on the surface as well as for deeper import. I have no idea whether or not the 2009 Pushkin Press edition that I read, with translation by John Elsworth, corrects that deficiency. So what have you heard about Petersburg? Vladimir Nabokov declared it one of the most important works of the twentieth century, but he also stated no good English translation was available. What an amazing, strange, wonderful, funny, frustrating, magical book. ![]() ![]() Demonstration on Octoby Ilya Yefimovich Repin ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Bright golden marsh flowers radiate in the chocolatey-brown hair of the African-American characters, while sky-blue backdrops and purple royal robes add a vibrant contrast to the lush green setting. ) stylized illustrations capture the emotion and the humor of the tale. So disguised, the heroine sneaks into the convention, and "with a voice as sweet as licorice," she wins the day and finds her mother (but not before the Prince of Music searches for the mystery soloist). After Crooked Foster Mother's evil twins depart for the audition, Cinderella evades the crocodiles, plucking wildflowers to affix to her simple dress and braiding vines for a belt. ![]() In Thomas's inspired version, a Great Gospel Convention is held instead of a ball, as Queen Mother Rhythm (along with the Prince of Music, her pianist) searches for a successor to lead the Great Gospel Choir. ![]() When a hurricane sweeps Queen Mother Rhythm's baby downstream, Crooked Foster Mother finds the mud-covered infant, names her Cinderella ("seein' how you're as dirty as a cinder pile") and brings her home to be a servant. ) puts a Southern spin on a well-known fairy tale for a charismatic adaptation set in the swamp. ![]() ![]() ![]() GB News deleted a tweet with Starkey’s remarks within an hour but it was swiftly screen-grabbed and shared by critics on Twitter. In 1953, many more MPs were invited to the late Queen’s coronation. It was reported that the slimmed-down figure had caused uproar among the parliamentarians. ![]() It was reported in February that around 80 MPs and peers are invited to the coronation. The prime minister, who was born in Southampton to African-born Hindu parents of Indian Punjabi descent, will be reading a passage from the Bible during the coronation. ![]() And, again, this coronation is going to highlight far too much our differences rather than what unites us.”Īsked if he was speaking “in terms of religion”, the 78-year-old agreed: “In terms of religion.”Ĭharles is the head of the Church of England, while Sunak is Hindu. “I know that’s a difficult and controversial thing to say, but I think it’s true. “The prime minister, the man of immense talent, of extraordinary skill, but really, not fully grounded in our culture,” he continued. I think one of the reasons that I think a lot has gone wrong, for example, why parliament has not been properly represented at the coronation of a parliamentary monarchy, is because the government isn’t interested in the constitution. Sitting outside Buckingham Palace, Starkey replied: “Invisible. The host, journalist and commentator Andrew Pierce, put it to Starkey that the prime minister had been “detached, or at least semi-detached, from this coronation”. ![]() ![]() ![]() Marcus and Daniel Handler (suspected to be the mysterious Lemony Snicket himself). As a bonus, the tape contains a hilarious interview between historian, critic and author Leonard S. ![]() Curry plays Olaf with an appropriately spooky whispering hiss and deserves extra kudos for his convincing portrayal of Poe's racking, sometimes phlegmy cough. After they unravel one of the count's more awful schemes, the children are eventually delivered from the situation, leading neatly into a sequel. Nasty in more ways than one, Count Olaf mistreats the children, leading them to quickly discover that he only wants their money. Poe, arranges for the orphans to live with a guardian, a creepy distant relative named Count Olaf. ![]() The executor of the Baudelaire parents' will and keeper of the family fortune, Mr. When the Baudelaire children, Violet, Klaus and baby Sunny, learn that their parents have perished in a fire at the family mansion, the children's rocky course is set for misery and misadventure (enough to fill the projected 13 volumes of this clever book series). Relates the sad saga with pity and enlightenment sparked by dashes of humor. British actor Tim Curry, whose reputation for playing dastardly villain types precedes him, is terrific in this adaptation of the intentionally over-the-top, slightly scary tale of the Baudelaire orphans. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Roosevelt not only sent his own commission to verify what Sinclair described but exchanged letters with the author to help validate the very details that frightened American consumers. Readers’ concerns from Sinclair’s novel soon became a political issue and escalated into a full-blown “meat scandal” in President Theodore Roosevelt’s administration. Sinclair happened yesterday, are happening today, and will happen tomorrow and the next day, until some Hercules comes to cleanse the filthy stable.” The action of the President … remove all doubt, and give the book very great importance … it is with nothing less than horror that we learn it to be true. ![]() ![]() The London Times’ 1906 literary review wrote about the novel’s real-world context: “Unhappily we have good reason for believing it to be all fact, not fiction. © Chaloner Woods breakingthewalls | adobe Stockįor most consumers, an initial exposure to the unseen dangers on their dinner plate came from Upton Sinclair’s 1906 novel “The Jungle” - specifically, two chapters in which he drew from his own observations of the Chicago meat-packing industry to describe conditions in which meat was prepared. ![]() |